The following is a list of my rough draft and peer review that I could find. I did not find the peer revision helpful, because I did not receive feedback from students, who were in my group.
Literacy Narrative Rough Draft
narrative_draft_1.docx | |
File Size: | 13 kb |
File Type: | docx |
Genre Analysis Rough Draft
genre_analysis.docx | |
File Size: | 19 kb |
File Type: | docx |
Dear Inphinite,
The organizational structure for this paper is quite good and makes it clear as to what is going to be discussed in each part of the paper. The major thing that I did not like, however, was that the opening paragraph of each of the article-related section seemed almost like a summary of those texts. Instead of summarizing entire articles, try focusing on the parts of the article that fulfill the needs of the paper, or, in other words, when looking over the articles, summarize them with a quick sentence if necessary, then talk about the aspects of that text that help to explain aspects of the genre itself.
-Brian Winarski.
The organizational structure for this paper is quite good and makes it clear as to what is going to be discussed in each part of the paper. The major thing that I did not like, however, was that the opening paragraph of each of the article-related section seemed almost like a summary of those texts. Instead of summarizing entire articles, try focusing on the parts of the article that fulfill the needs of the paper, or, in other words, when looking over the articles, summarize them with a quick sentence if necessary, then talk about the aspects of that text that help to explain aspects of the genre itself.
-Brian Winarski.
Annotated Bibliography Rough Draft
psychogenic_movement_disorders_draft.docx | |
File Size: | 15 kb |
File Type: | docx |
Annotated Bibliography Feedback
Zachary Morris
to start i will say what is clearly missing. You are missing a focus in the beginning, and general titles and names. More importantly while i see some of your annotations mention credibility and its important to the discourse, others do not. perhaps i missed those points. either you need to make them more clear or you need to add them in. other than that you dont have enough annotations yet because they are long a few more will do.
Zachary Morris
to start i will say what is clearly missing. You are missing a focus in the beginning, and general titles and names. More importantly while i see some of your annotations mention credibility and its important to the discourse, others do not. perhaps i missed those points. either you need to make them more clear or you need to add them in. other than that you dont have enough annotations yet because they are long a few more will do.
Literature Review Rough Draft
literature_review_draft_3.docx | |
File Size: | 18 kb |
File Type: | docx |
Feedback from teacher
literature_review_draft_2.docx | |
File Size: | 24 kb |
File Type: | docx |